Showing posts with label A. (subjects)-Humanities-Religion & Spirituality-(religion & spirituality). Show all posts
Showing posts with label A. (subjects)-Humanities-Religion & Spirituality-(religion & spirituality). Show all posts

2016-01-08

Dean Zimmerman - How Does God Relate to Time?


source: Closer To Truth     2016年1月5日
What is the relationship between God and time? Does God exist in time, being everlasting, without beginning or end?
Click here to watch more interviews on God and time http://bit.ly/1OJElYV
Click here to watch more interviews with Dean Zimmerman http://bit.ly/1mCXKho
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com

Eleonore Stump - How Does God Relate to Time?


source: Closer To Truth       2016年1月5日
What is the relationship between God and time? Does God exist in time, being everlasting, without beginning or end?
Click here to hear more interviews on how God relates to time http://bit.ly/1OJElYV
Click here for more interviews with Eleonore Stump http://bit.ly/1Oxcf1e
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com

David Hunt - How Does God Relate to Time?


source: Closer To Truth     2016年1月5日
What is the relationship between God and time? Does God exist in time, being everlasting, without beginning or end?
Click here to watch more interviews on God and time http://bit.ly/1OJElYV
Click here to watch more interviews with David Hunt http://bit.ly/1PKDJRK
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com

2015-08-26

Frank Schaeffer: "Why I am an Atheist Who Believes in GOD" | Talks at Go...


source: Talks at Google      2015年8月18日
Frank Schaeffer visited Google's office in Cambridge, MA to discuss his book, "Why I am an Atheist Who Believes in GOD: How to Give Love, Create Beauty and Find Peace".

The book is Mr. Schaeffer's latest set of observations on the human condition and our relation to spirituality, religion, art, and the universe. He was born into a family of prominent evangelicals, and helped found the Religious Right in the U.S. Rejecting that political point of view, he became a vocal enemy of the Tea Party. He has been a film director; a New York Times-bestselling author of fiction and nonfiction; a visual artist whose work has been shown, and collected, around the world; a frequent guest on The Rachel Maddow Show, with appearances on Oprah, The Today Show, Fresh Air, and BBC News; and an a highly sought-after lecturer, with appearances at Princeton and the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.

2014-01-14

British politician exposes global plan

British politician exposes global plan
source: Transmission5D  2013年03月18日
Whitby (UK) Town Councillor Simon Parkes exposes government lies, global plans and more. His mother and grandfather worked for UK military intelligence (MI5/MI6).


SIMON PARKES : The Project Avalon Interview
source: source: AlphaZebra  2014年01月13日

The interview, which took place at Simon's home on 15 December 2013, was facilitated by Avalon moderator Karelia.

Simon discusses and expands on the future of Earth, the Mantid and Reptilian influences, his own role as one of many arbiters on the planet, our free will, our individual responsibility and the opportunities that lie before us, the part played by the Illuminati and the other Global Controllers, the history of our planet, and much, much more. He is very active on the Avalon Forum in a members-only area, and regularly answers questions there.

Born to an illuminati family [Simon Parkes] Lifting the veil conference (Leeds 2013)
source: WeAreChange Manchester  2013年07月21日
http://www.CriticalMassRadio.co.uk

2013-09-15

The Afterlife Investigations 1 - Rupert Sheldrake, PhD


source: UFOTVstudios

The Afterlife Investigations 2 - Researcher Montague Keen


source: UFOTVstudios

The Afterlife Investigations 3 - Dr. David Fontana


source: UFOTVstudios

Frans de Waal: Morality Without Religion


source: bigthink 2013-05-22
A long tradition of thinking tells us that due to man's animal nature we need to have order imposed from above, in the form of religion. Without religion, we could not live together, and that is why all human societies believe in the supernatural and have developed one religion or another.

This view, which the biologist and primatologist Frans de Waal calls Veneer Theory, is an essentially pessimistic view "that morality is a thin veneer over a nasty human nature."

In his new book, The Bonobo and the Atheist: In Search of Humanism Among the Primates (http://goo.gl/OCus5), de Waal challenges this theory, arguing that human morality is older than religion, and indeed an innate quality. In other words, religion did not give us morality. Religion built onto a pre-existing moral system that governed how our species behaved.

de Waal's argument, which he has been making for years, is strengthened by the fact that recent research is starting to paint a better picture of the kind of cognitive processing that empathy requires. It turns out that empathy is not as complex as we had imagined, and that is why other animals are capable of it as well as humans.

So if being moral is so easy, can we dispatch with religion altogether?

That is an experiment that no one has tried, and which de Waal finds intriguing. The problem, as de Waal points out in the video, is that we need someone to be keeping watch in large-scale societies in which "we cannot all keep an eye on each other."

Transcript--
Well, religion is an interesting topic because religion is universal. All human societies believe in the supernatural. All human societies have a religion one way or another. Which for the biologists must mean that religion has some advantages -- offers some advantages to a society. Otherwise we wouldn't have that strong tendency to develop it. And so for me that's actually a far more interesting question of whether God exists or doesn't exist. That sort of question I cannot answer. But the question of why we have religions is an interesting question. And my view is that morality, our human morality, is older than religion so instead of saying morality comes from God or religion gave us morality. For me that's a big no-no.

Our current religions are just 2,000 or 3,000 years old which is very young. And our species is much older and I cannot imagine that, for example, a hundred thousand years or two hundred thousand years our ancestors did not have some type of morality. Of course they had rules about how you should behave, what is fair, what is unfair, caring for others -- all of these tendencies were in place already so they had a moral system and then at some point we developed these present day religions which I think we're sort of tacked on to the morality that we had. And maybe they served to codify them or to enforce them or to steer morality in a particular direction that we prefer.

So religion comes in for me secondarily. I'm struggling with whether we need religion. So personally I think we can be moral without religion because we probably had morality long before the current religions came along. So I think we can be moral without religion but in large scale societies where we are not all keeping an eye on each other because we -- in societies with a thousand people or several thousand or millions of people we cannot all keep an eye on each other. And that's maybe why we installed religions in these large scale societies where a God kept watch over everybody.

And then the question becomes is this really needed? Now in northern Europe -- I'm from the Netherlands -- there is basically an experiment going on. In northern Europe the majority of people are not religious anymore. When you ask them they say they're nonbelievers. And they still have a moral society as far as I can tell. And so there is a sort of experiment going on there -- can we set up a society where religion is not dominant at least? It may be present but it's not dominant anymore, there is still a moral society. And until now I think that experiment is going pretty well. And so I am optimistic that religion is not strictly needed. But I cannot be a hundred percent sure because we've never really tried -- there is no human society where religion is totally absent so we really have never tried this experiment.

Directed / Produced by Jonathan Fowler and Elizabeth Rodd

Lesley Hazleton: The doubt essential to faith


source: TEDtalksDirector 2013-06-24
When Lesley Hazleton was writing a biography of Muhammad, she was struck by something: The night he received the revelation of the Koran, according to early accounts, his first reaction was doubt, awe, even fear. And yet this experience became the bedrock of his belief. Hazleton calls for a new appreciation of doubt and questioning as the foundation of faith -- and an end to fundamentalism of all kinds.

# with English subtitle:
http://www.ted.com/talks/lesley_hazleton_the_doubt_essential_to_faith.html

Writing biography is a strange thing to do. It's a journey into the foreign territory of somebody else's life, a journey, an exploration that can take you places you never dreamed of going and still can't quite believe you've been, especially if, like me, you're an agnostic Jew and the life you've been exploring is that of Muhammad.

Five years ago, for instance, I found myself waking each morning in misty Seattle to what I knew was an impossible question: What actually happened one desert night, half the world and almost half of history away? What happened, that is, on the night in the year 610 when Muhammad received the first revelation of the Koran on a mountain just outside Mecca?This is the core mystical moment of Islam, and as such, of course, it defies empirical analysis. Yet the question wouldn't let go of me. I was fully aware that for someone as secular as I am, just asking it could be seen as pure chutzpah. (Laughter) And I plead guilty as charged, because all exploration, physical or intellectual, is inevitably in some sense an act of transgression, of crossing boundaries.

Still, some boundaries are larger than others. So a human encountering the divine, as Muslims believe Muhammad did, to the rationalist, this is a matter not of fact but of wishful fiction, and like all of us, I like to think of myself as rational.

Which might be why when I looked at the earliest accounts we have of that night, what struck me even more than what happened was what did not happen. Muhammad did not come floating off the mountain as though walking on air. He did not run down shouting, "Hallelujah!" and "Bless the Lord!" He did not radiate light and joy. There were no choirs of angels, no music of the spheres, no elation, no ecstasy, no golden aura surrounding him,no sense of an absolute, fore-ordained role as the messenger of God. That is, he did none of the things that might make it easy to cry foul, to put down the whole story as a pious fable.Quite the contrary. In his own reported words, he was convinced at first that what had happened couldn't have been real. At best, he thought, it had to have been a hallucination --a trick of the eye or the ear, perhaps, or his own mind working against him. At worst, possession -- that he'd been seized by an evil jinn, a spirit out to deceive him, even to crush the life out of him. In fact, he was so sure that he could only be majnun, possessed by a jinn, that when he found himself still alive, his first impulse was to finish the job himself, to leap off the highest cliff and escape the terror of what he'd experienced by putting an end to all experience.

So the man who fled down the mountain that night trembled not with joy but with a stark, primordial fear. He was overwhelmed not with conviction, but by doubt. And that panicked disorientation, that sundering of everything familiar, that daunting awareness of somethingbeyond human comprehension, can only be called a terrible awe.

This might be somewhat difficult to grasp now that we use the word "awesome" to describe a new app or a viral video. With the exception perhaps of a massive earthquake, we're protected from real awe. We close the doors and hunker down, convinced that we're in control, or, at least, hoping for control. We do our best to ignore the fact that we don't always have it, and that not everything can be explained. Yet whether you're a rationalist or a mystic, whether you think the words Muhammad heard that night came from inside himself or from outside, what's clear is that he did experience them, and that he did so with a force that would shatter his sense of himself and his world and transform this otherwise modest man into a radical advocate for social and economic justice. Fear was the only sane response, the only human response.

Too human for some, like conservative Muslim theologians who maintain that the account of his wanting to kill himself shouldn't even be mentioned, despite the fact that it's in the earliest Islamic biographies. They insist that he never doubted for even a single moment, let alone despaired. Demanding perfection, they refuse to tolerate human imperfection. Yet what, exactly, is imperfect about doubt? As I read those early accounts, I realized it wasprecisely Muhammad's doubt that brought him alive for me, that allowed me to begin to see him in full, to accord him the integrity of reality. And the more I thought about it, the more it made sense that he doubted, because doubt is essential to faith.

If this seems a startling idea at first, consider that doubt, as Graham Greene once put it, is the heart of the matter. Abolish all doubt, and what's left is not faith, but absolute, heartless conviction. You're certain that you possess the Truth -- inevitably offered with an implied uppercase T -- and this certainty quickly devolves into dogmatism and righteousness, by which I mean a demonstrative, overweening pride in being so very right, in short, the arrogance of fundamentalism. It has to be one of the multiple ironies of history that a favorite expletive of Muslim fundamentalists is the same one once used by the Christian fundamentalists known as Crusaders: "infidel," from the Latin for "faithless." Doubly ironic, in this case, because their absolutism is in fact the opposite of faith. In effect, they are the infidels. Like fundamentalists of all religious stripes, they have no questions, only answers.They found the perfect antidote to thought and the ideal refuge of the hard demands of real faith. They don't have to struggle for it like Jacob wrestling through the night with the angel,or like Jesus in his 40 days and nights in the wilderness, or like Muhammad, not only that night on the mountain, but throughout his years as a prophet, with the Koran constantly urging him not to despair, and condemning those who most loudly proclaim that they know everything there is to know and that they and they alone are right.

And yet we, the vast and still far too silent majority, have ceded the public arena to this extremist minority. We've allowed Judaism to be claimed by violently messianic West Bank settlers, Christianity by homophobic hypocrites and misogynistic bigots, Islam by suicide bombers. And we've allowed ourselves to be blinded to the fact that no matter whether they claim to be Christians,

2013-09-14

Margaret Atwood on Faith and Reason (with Bill Moyers on PBS)

source: PBS    2006-07-21
On Bill Moyers on Faith & Reason, airing Friday, July 28 at 9 p.m. on PBS (check local listings), writers Margaret Atwood and Martin Amis show how the imagination of the creative mind can help cross the boundaries between faith and reason and to see the best and worst of human possibilities. Atwood's most famous novel, The Handmaid's Tale, depicts a democracy transformed into a theocracy of God-quoting true believers who strip women of their rights. Bill Moyers explores how these two confessed agnostics come to grips with a world immersed in belief.

For more of the interviews, and a chance to share what *you* find important on matters of Faith & Reason, visit the program's website (www.pbs.org/moyers) and watch the broadcasts on PBS.

For the complete interview and more of Atwood's viewpoints on faith, reason, science, religion, and some other relevant issues:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/faithandreason/watch_atwood.html

source: aluckypunk



about Margaret Atwood:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Atwood

Albert Einstein on God


source: dracumelenios 2009-12-22
This video discusses the spiritual beliefs of Prof. Albert Einstein and how they have been a subject for debate in recent years.

Stephen Hawking: God Didn't Create The Universe


source: PrinceOfLogic  2010-09-02
Stephen Hawking makes the claim in his new book Grand Design (to be published next week). The media took the story to mystifying heights... I thought we knew that one does does not need God in physics since the time of Laplace?

Dr Michio Kaku on Immortality, The Bible, and Scientific Evidence of Geo...


source: ScientiaMathema

The Extended Mind: Recent Experimental Evidence (by Rupert Sheldrake)


source: GoogleTechTalks 2008-09-05
Google Tech Talks September 2, 2008

ABSTRACT
We have been brought up to believe that the mind is located inside the head. But there are good reasons for thinking that this view is too limited. Recent experimental results show that people can influence others at a distance just by looking at them, even if they look from behind and if all sensory clues are eliminated. And people's intentions can be detected by animals from miles away. The commonest kind of non-local interaction mental influence occurs in connection with telephone calls, where most people have had the experience of thinking of someone shortly before they ring. Controlled, randomized tests on telephone telepathy have given highly significant positive results. Research techniques have now been automated and experiments on telepathy are now being conducted through the internet and cell phones, enabling widespread participation.

Speaker: Rupert Sheldrake
Rupert Sheldrake, Ph.D. is a biologist and author of more than 75 technical papers and ten books, the most recent being The Sense of Being Stared At. He studied at Cambridge and Harvard Universities, was a Fellow of Clare College, Cambridge and a Research Fellow of the Royal Society. He is currently Director of the Perrott-Warrick project, funded from Trinity College Cambridge.