2013-09-15

David Eagleman - Seeing Sound, Tasting Color: Synesthesia


source: bigthink
"There are many different forms," says David Eagleman, a neuroscientist known for his ability to garner important insights into the nature of perception and consciousness through idiosyncratic methods. "Essentially, any cross-blending of the senses that you can think of, my colleagues and I have found a case somewhere."
Directed / Produced by
Jonathan Fowler and Elizabeth Rodd

Transcript--
David Eagleman: One of the things I study in my lab is called synesthesia, and it represents a blending of the senses. So we've all heard the anesthesia, which means no feeling. Synesthesia means joined feeling. So somebody with synesthesia, they might hear music and it causes them to see colors physically, or they might hear something and it puts a taste in their mouth, physically they're experiencing that, or they might eat something and it puts a feeling on their fingertips. The most common forms of synesthesia have to do with over-learned sequences, like letters or numbers or weekdays or months, triggering a color experience. So somebody might look at the number six and that's red to that synesthete, or they look at the letter J and that's purple. And it's an internal experience, it's automatic, it's involuntary and it's unconscious, and to a synesthete it's just self-evidently true that J is purple.

It used to be thought this was very rare. The original estimates were 1 in 20,000, but we now know it's quite common. It's probably up to 4 percent of the population has some form of synesthesia. There are many different forms. Essentially, any cross-blending of the senses that you can think of, my colleagues and I have found a case somewhere, so we now know it's very common. And the reason it's so interesting to me is because it's a very good inroad into understanding how different brains can be perceive reality differently, so you're sitting here, your neighbor is sitting here and you're both looking at the same thing and yet you're seeing the world very differently.

And it turns out synesthesia is heritable, so my lab is pulling the genes for it right now. And the reason that's so interesting is because it's what I'm calling perceptual genomics, which is to say how do little genetic changes change the way we perceive reality. And, of course, most synesthetes, historically, have lived their whole lives and they may even die without ever suspecting that they're seeing reality differently than someone else because we all accept the reality presented to us. So synesthesia is a really direct way to look at how individual changes can lead to different beliefs about reality.

Oliver Sacks:從幻覺認識我們的心智(中英字幕)


source: TEDtalksDirector / DesignSourceTWIWAN
Neurologist and author Oliver Sacks brings our attention to Charles Bonnett syndrome -- when visually impaired people experience lucid hallucinations. He describes the experiences of his patients in heartwarming detail and walks us through the biology of this under-reported phenomenon.

Martin L. Rossman - How Your Brain Can Turn Anxiety into Calmness


source: UCtelevsion
Physician, author, speaker, researcher, and consultant Martin L. Rossman, MD, discusses how to use the power of the healing mind to reduce stress and anxiety, relieve pain, change lifestyle habits, and live with more wellness. Series: UCSF Mini Medical School for the Public [3/2010] [Health and Medicine] [Show ID: 17631]

The Afterlife Investigations 1 - Rupert Sheldrake, PhD


source: UFOTVstudios

The Afterlife Investigations 2 - Researcher Montague Keen


source: UFOTVstudios

The Afterlife Investigations 3 - Dr. David Fontana


source: UFOTVstudios

Julian Treasure: Why architects need to use their ears


source: TED    2012年9月18日
Because of poor acoustics, students in classrooms miss 50 percent of what their teachers say and patients in hospitals have trouble sleeping because they continually feel stressed. Julian Treasure sounds a call to action for designers to pay attention to the "invisible architecture" of sound.

Lisa Kristine: Photos that bear witness to modern slavery


source: TED 2012-09-28
For the past two years, photographer Lisa Kristine has traveled the world, documenting the unbearably harsh realities of modern-day slavery. She shares hauntingly beautiful images -- miners in the Congo, brick layers in Nepal -- illuminating the plight of the 27 million souls enslaved worldwide. (Filmed at TEDxMaui)

Steven Pinker: Language and Consciousness, Part 1 Complete: Thinking Al...


source: ThinkingAllowedTV   2012年10月8日
http://www.thinkingallowed.com/2spink...
This is Part 1 of a four part, two-hour Thinking Allowed DVD. Are our thoughts shaped by the language we use?

Julian Treasure-聲音影響我們的四種方式(中文字幕)


source: TED / dxmonline

Evan Grant: 藉由cymatics技術使聲音可視化(中英字幕)


source: TED / DesignSourceTAIWAN
Evan Grant demonstrates the science and art of cymatics, a process for making soundwaves visible. Useful for analyzing complex sounds (like dolphin calls), it also makes complex and beautiful designs.

Leon Botstein: Art Now (Aesthetics Across Music, Painting, Architecture,...


source: bigthink
Leon Botstein, Conductor / President of Bard College

President Leon Botstein of Bard College steps boldly into the fray to answer one of the most enduring human questions: What is art? This discussion spills over into debates about art's value to society ---- whether access to the arts is right as basic as education or health care, and whether it should be assessed and supported by government or left to the "invisible hand" of the free market. President Botstein explains why it is essential to ask these questions and offers a sturdy basis for evaluating them. He goes so far as to suggest that engaging with art can give our lives meaning and purpose. 

The Floating University
Originally released September 2011.

Michio Kaku: The Universe in a Nutshell


source: bigthink
The Universe in a Nutshell: The Physics of Everything
Michio Kaku, Henry Semat Professor of Theoretical Physics at CUNY

What if we could find one single equation that explains every force in the universe? Dr. Michio Kaku explores how physicists may shrink the science of the Big Bang into an equation as small as Einstein's "e=mc^2." Thanks to advances in string theory, physics may allow us to escape the heat death of the universe, explore the multiverse, and unlock the secrets of existence. While firing up our imaginations about the future, Kaku also presents a succinct history of physics and makes a compelling case for why physics is the key to pretty much everything.

The Floating University
Originally released September, 2011.

Steven Pinker: Linguistics as a Window to Understanding the Brain


source: bigthink
Steven Pinker - Psychologist, Cognitive Scientist, and Linguist at Harvard University

How did humans acquire language? In this lecture, best-selling author Steven Pinker introduces you to linguistics, the evolution of spoken language, and the debate over the existence of an innate universal grammar. He also explores why language is such a fundamental part of social relationships, human biology, and human evolution. Finally, Pinker touches on the wide variety of applications for linguistics, from improving how we teach reading and writing to how we interpret law, politics, and literature.

The Floating University
Originally released September, 2011.
# relevant link:
http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/phf1964-phf1964/article?mid=1117&prev=1118&next=1116&l=d&fid=1

Joel Cohen: An Introduction to Demography (Malthus Miffed: Are People th...


source: bigthink
Malthus Miffed: Are People the Problem, the Solution, or Both? An Introduction to Demography and Populations Study through an Examination of the World's Population

Professor Joel Cohen: Abby Rockefeller Mauzé Professor of Populations, Rockefeller University, Mathematical Biologist, Columbia University.

In the next fifty years the world will face population problems that it has never faced before. Billions will live in mega slums without access to clean water or medical care. In his lecture, Professor Joel Cohen teaches you how demography can provide answers to the life or death questions caused by the world's swelling population and dwindling resources. Can we prevent an outcome where wealthy western countries are in permanent population decline, while third world cities into swell into massively overcrowded slums with no access to education, healthcare, or hope?

The Floating University
Originally released September, 2011.

Tamar Gendler: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Politics and Economics


source: bigthink
Tamar Gendler, Department of Philosophy Chair at Yale University, Cognitive Scientist

Who gets what and who says so? These two questions underlie and inform every social arrangement from the resolution of schoolyard squabbles to the meta-structure of human societies. They are also the basis of political philosophy. Professor Tamar Gendler uses the work of three titans of the discipline, Thomas Hobbes, John Rawls, and Robert Nozick, as a lens to guide us through the taut debate about the role of government in society, asking "Will we embrace the radical state of nature or will we surrender our freedom to the leviathan of the state?"

The Floating University
Originally released September 2011.

Dennis Charney: Neuroplasticity and Your Resilient Brain


source: bigthink
Mindfulness therapy is an emerging, non-pharmacological therapy that involves exercising the human brain to improve learning, memory problems, anxiety and problems with depression.

Dennis S. Charney, MD, is the Dean of the Mt. Sinai School of Medicine and a world expert in the neurobiology and treatment of mood and anxiety disorders. He has made fundamental contributions to the understanding of neural circuits and neurochemistry related to human anxiety, fear, mood and discovery of new treatment for mood and anxiety disorders. He later expanded this area into pioneering research related to the psychobiological mechanisms of human resilience to stress. He's a professor of neuroscience at Mt. Sinai.
Charney's most recent book is Resilience: The Science of Mastering Life's Greatest Challenges: http://www.amazon.com/Resilience-Science-Mastering-Greatest-Challenges/dp/052...

A prolific author, Dr. Charney has written more than 700 publications, including groundbreaking scientific papers, chapters, and books. He has authored a many books, including Neurobiology of Mental Illness (Oxford University Press, USA, Third Edition, 2009); The Peace of Mind Prescription: An Authoritative Guide to Finding the Most Effective Treatment for Anxiety and Depression (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2004); The Physicians Guide to Depression and Bipolar Disorders (McGraw-Hill Professional, 2006), and Resilience and Mental Health: Challenges Across the Lifespan (Cambridge University Press, 2011). Dr.

Transcript--
One of the things that we have found in our research is that in general we don't make full use of the capacity of the human brain. We identified that actually initially from hearing from a couple of the POWs when they were in solitary confinement. They told us that when they were in solitary confinement for years and all they had was the ability to think that they developed unusual cognitive capacities that they never had before when they were in solitary confinement, like they were essentially exercising their brain.

One individual told us he was able to multiply eventually many numbers by many numbers, 12 numbers by 12 numbers accurately. Never was able to do that before. Another told us that he was able to remember to very early times in his childhood, like remembering the names of the students in his kindergarten class. Admiral Shoemaker, one of the individuals that we came to admire a lot, built a house in his mind nail by nail, cabinet by cabinet, room by room and then when he got out he built that house, and when we met him he was having a fight with his wife because she wanted to renovate the house and he said no way was that going to happen.

That brought home that when you exercise your brain and you don't have any outside distractions because you're in solitary, you have enormous capacities. Our research group subsequently hearing about this and others around the country have now taken a tact that through specific exercises we might be able to enhance brain plasticity, or using more of the capacity of the human brain.

For example, we now have a research study in which where through exercises, through psychological exercises are trying to retrain the circuits that are involved in depression. It's not a typical psychotherapy. It's very specifically oriented toward improving the circuits that are involved in causing human depression. So far there are some positive results around that. For certain forms of learning and memory problems, new therapies have been developed that exercise the human brain around learning and memory mechanisms. With human anxiety, practicing certain techniques that tap into the circuits and the chemistry of anxiety is now an area of focus. Mindfulness therapy is an example of that.

So that's a really emerging area to develop new therapies, non pharmacological therapies, that exercise the human brain to improve learning and memory problems and anxiety and problems with depression.

Directed / Produced by
Jonathan Fowler & Elizabeth Rodd

Nicholas Christakis: The Sociological Science Behind Social Networks and...


source: bigthink
If You're So Free, Why Do You Follow Others? The Sociological Science Behind Social Networks and Social Influence.

Nicholas Christakis, Professor of Medical Sociology, Medicine, and Sociology at Harvard University.

If you think you're in complete control of your destiny or even your own actions, you're wrong. Every choice you make, every behavior you exhibit, and even every desire you have finds its roots in the social universe. Nicholas Christakis explains why individual actions are inextricably linked to sociological pressures; whether you're absorbing altruism performed by someone you'll never meet or deciding to jump off the Golden Gate Bridge, collective phenomena affect every aspect of your life. By the end of the lecture Christakis has revealed a startling new way to understand the world that ranks sociology as one of the most vitally important social sciences.

The Floating University
Originally released September 2011.

Beau Lotto--Optical illusions show (發現人類視覺的假象)


(TED) Beau Lotto--Optical illusions show: how we see
http://www.ted.com/talks/beau_lotto_optical_illusions_show_how_we_see.html
source: dxmonline

Saul Levmore: Monopolies as an Introduction to Economics


source: bigthink
Saul Levmore, William B. Graham Distinguished Professor of Law at The University of Chicago.

In the study of economics, the big questions recapitulate the little ones. If you think about the cost of a chocolate chip cookie or how airline ticket pricing works and you do so rigorously with an inquisitive mind, you will soon enough gain insight into how the whole world really operates. From the basics of pricing, demand, and competition to global politics and the future of government, Professor Levmore makes it easy to see economics at work all around us.

The Floating University
Originally released September 2011.

Jeffrey Brenzel: The Essential Value of a Classic Education


source: bigthink
Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: The Essential Value of a Classic Education.

JEFFREY BRENZEL, Philosopher, Dean of Undergraduate Admissions at Yale University

Dean Brenzel argues that not only can reading the great classics like Plato's Republic and Dante's Inferno enrich your education, it can actually make your life better. Pointing out that we can't possibly read all of the books in the world, Brenzel makes a case for reading the right books the right way in order to get the most intellectual bang for your reading buck. Which books qualify as the "right" books is one of the most controversial subjects in academia, and Brenzel outlines the five key characteristics that every great book must fulfill in order to make that coveted list.

The Floating University
Originally released September 2011.

Colin Stokes: How movies teach manhood


source: TEDtalksDirector Published on Jan 18, 2013
When Colin Stokes' 3-year-old son caught a glimpse of Star Wars, he was instantly obsessed. But what messages did he absorb from the sci-fi classic? Stokes asks for more movies that send positive messages to boys: that cooperation is heroic, and respecting women is as manly as defeating the villain. (Filmed at TEDxBeaconStreet.)

Valentine's Day: Science of Love


source: historychannel    2013年2月10日
Explore the chemical reaction inside the brain when it encounters love.

Sonja Lyubomirsky: Who Says You Need a Partner to be Happy on Valentine'...


source: bigthink 2013-02-14
http://bigthink.com/big-think-tv/5-re...

If you don't have that special someone this Valentine's Day, don't despair. You're in good company. Nearly 50 percent of American adults are single. And many of them are happily single. In fact, "there are many life-long singles, especially women, who are very happy, who are no less happy than married or partnered people," says Sonja Lyubomirsky, professor of psychology at the University of California, Riverside and the author of The Myths of Happiness.

In this video, Lyubomirsky lays out the reasons why singles should not be stigmatized by society as people who must be "more lonely, more sad, more deprived, and even less mature." As Lyubomirsky points out, single people do in fact have "rewarding, lasting and meaningful relationships."

Transcript:
Happiness Myth: "I can't be happy when I don't have a partner."
Sonja Lyubomirsky: "I can't be happy when I don't have a partner." So, we grow up in a culture that's very couple oriented and so people who don't find partners or don't find partners for a long time feel deviant, they feel discriminated against, they're not invited to parties... and so it could cause a lot of unhappiness.

I talk about the research that's actually been written a lot by Bella DePaulo, who's a researcher in this area, about how happy a lot of single people are. So, it turns out that there are many life-long singles; in fact, I believe half of the adults in the United States today are single. There are many life-long singles, especially women, who are very happy, who are no less happy than married or partnered peopled. They have -- they tend to have a lot of friends, a dozen or more really deep friendships. I mean, can those of you who are married and have children, you know, can you say the same for yourself? Do you have a dozen really deep friendships that with whom you, you know, keep in touch with on a very regular basis?

Single people tend to be very close to their family members, you know, nieces, nephews, siblings, parents. And their friends are their own. You know, when you think about it when you're married and with children, a lot of your friends are not really chosen by you; they might be your partner's friends or they might be your kid's friends' parents, but when you're single you tend to choose your friends.

The bottom line is, I mean, what I like to highlight is that there are a lot single people who are very happy. And so if you have not found a partner or if you're not sure if you want to compromise or you want to live with someone else for the rest of your life, there's just a lot of hope for you out there from the science.

Ordinary Magic Trick: Become your best possible self. Focus on your personal goals.

Sonja Lyubomirsky: So if you're single, maybe you're not so happy being single. Instead of kind of focusing so desperately on finding a partner, I talk about becoming your best possible single self and there's research on what are called "best possible selves" and they're basically kind of ideal visions of ourselves, sort of what -- when you think about yourself in five years and ten years and 20 years, you know, who do you want to be? What kind of person do you want to be? What do you want to be doing?

So basically what research suggests is that focusing on that, focusing on the future, focusing on your goals, makes people happy, you know, striving actually makes people much happier than actually -- than even achieving. And then maybe in the process you might find someone, but you're not -- you know, you're going to be, hopefully, you're going to be happy sort of pursuing all the different myriad goals in your life in becoming the best person you can be. That's a much healthier approach than just sit around and mope about the fact that you're single.

And so, again, this really ties back to the -- to one of the themes of the book that happiness lies within, that you could be a single person and you could be a very happy single person... and a lot of it depends on sort of what you focus on, what do you think about. Or you could be a single person and you can dwell on the fact that you're single and how depressed that makes you and be an unhappy person.

So, again, happiness really lies within us, not outside of us.

Directed / Produced by
Jonathan Fowler & Elizabeth Rodd

Rollo May: The Human Dilemma (Part One Complete): Thinking Allowed with ...


source: ThinkingAllowedTV 2013-03-19
http://www.thinkingallowed.com/2rmay....
NOTE: This is the full broadcast portion of the 88-minute DVD interview.

Existential psychology emphasizes philosophic rather than psychopathological aspects of the human condition. In this animated, two-part discussion, Dr. May proposes that genuine growth comes from confronting the pain of existence rather than escaping into banal pleasures or shallow, positive thinking. Genuine joy, he says, can emerge from an appreciation of life's agonies.

The late psychotherapist Rollo May was a recipient of the Distinguished Career Award of the American Psychological Association and a founding sponsor of the Association for Humanistic Psychology. He was author of numerous classic works including Love and Will, Psychology and the Human Dilemma, Freedom and Destiny, Dreams and Symbols, The Meaning of Anxiety and Man's Search for Himself.

Allan Savory: How to green the world's deserts and reverse climate change


source: TEDtalksDirector 2013-03-04
"Desertification is a fancy word for land that is turning to desert," begins Allan Savory in this quietly powerful talk. And terrifyingly, it's happening to about two-thirds of the world's grasslands, accelerating climate change and causing traditional grazing societies to descend into social chaos. Savory has devoted his life to stopping it. He now believes -- and his work so far shows -- that a surprising factor can protect grasslands and even reclaim degraded land that was once desert.

中文字幕:
http://www.ted.com/talks/allan_savory_how_to_green_the_world_s_deserts_and_reverse_climate_change.html

Elon Musk: The mind behind Tesla, SpaceX, SolarCity ...


source: TEDtalksDirector 2013-03-19
Entrepreneur Elon Musk is a man with many plans. The founder of PayPal, Tesla Motors and SpaceX sits down with TED curator Chris Anderson to share details about his visionary projects, which include a mass-marketed electric car, a solar energy leasing company and a fully reusable rocket.
Find closed captions and translated subtitles in many languages at http://www.ted.com/translate

Taylor Wilson: My radical plan for small nuclear fission reactors


source: TEDtalksDirector 2013-04-30
Taylor Wilson was 14 when he built a nuclear fusion reactor in his parents' garage. Now 19, he returns to the TED stage to present a new take on an old topic: fission. Wilson, who has won backing to create a company to realize his vision, explains why he's so excited about his innovative design for small modular fission reactors -- and why it could be the next big step in solving the global energy crisis.

中文字幕
http://www.ted.com/talks/taylor_wilson_my_radical_plan_for_small_nuclear_fission_reactors.html

Juan Enriquez: Your online life, permanent as a tattoo


source: TEDtalksDirector 2013-05-02
What if Andy Warhol had it wrong, and instead of being famous for 15 minutes, we're only anonymous for that long? In this short talk, Juan Enriquez looks at the surprisingly permanent effects of digital sharing on our personal privacy. He shares insight from the ancient Greeks to help us deal with our new "digital tattoos."

谷歌CEO大膽預測 科技改變6大人類生活型態

source: 鉅亨網劉季清 綜合外電 | 鉅亨網 – 2013年4月29日

全球科技大老谷歌執行長出書了!谷歌執行長施密特(Eric Schmidt)的新書《數位新時代》(The New Digital Age)於上週二(23日)正式發售。《CNN》報導,這本萬眾矚目的新書是由施密特和谷歌智庫(Google Ideas) 總監柯恩(Jared Cohen)共同寫成。本書中,施密特大膽預估未來科技改變人類生活的6大趨勢。

施密特︰「本書討論的不只是科技,更是人類未來互動、生活的型態。」

1. 網路隱私教育相當重要,要及早開始:未來的孩子在網路的生活,會比平日的生活活躍。父母必需及早教導孩子網路隱私、網路安全的觀念,甚至要比教導孩子性觀念還早。

2.行動網路崛起,2020年全球都可上網:智慧型手機越來越便宜,將大大改變人類生活。行動網路迅速崛起,加上智慧型手機價格越趨便宜,將大幅改變人類吸收、使用資訊的方式。據統計,在非洲,目前有6500萬人使用智慧型手機,在亞洲則有30億人。

3.社群網路的角色越來越重要:新聞媒體不再是即時訊息的主要來源。新形成的組織若不跟上社群網站(如Twitter),則將會逐漸被淘汰。書中提到,未來的世代,資訊會比現在更爆炸,人們對於跟不上最新消息的組織、企業和媒體將沒有耐心。企業必須不斷調整目標、方法和組織架構,才能跟上全球瞬息萬變的腳步。

4.雲端資料庫將成為常態,徹底改變人類隱私權:網路不斷進化,個人在網路上的虛擬世界不斷擴大,而個人資料也有可能隨之被公開。書中指出,網路的資訊是公開的,不要在網路上隨意發表言論、張貼文章,因為所有你曾瀏覽過的網站、你的社交圈、你喜歡的事物,別人在你的社交網路上發表的意見,都可能會被公開。

5. 反政府的革命將會透過網路達到史無前例的頻繁:透過網路和新興科技,人們將有更多管道可以推動革命。主導這些反政府的革命主要族群大多會是年輕人,原因之一為年輕人對網路和新科技較熟悉,原因之二為全世界的年輕人都有一股傲氣和激進性格。

6.恐怖攻擊透過網路將更為猖獗:恐怖主義不會消失,並且將對社會產生毀滅性的作用。書中指出,未來10年的上網人口將越來越年輕,許多社會邊陲的年輕人,很可能透過網路來策劃恐怖攻擊。雖然網路可以變成策劃恐怖攻擊的工具之一,但卻也使兇手更容易被發現。就算再怎樣精心策劃恐怖攻擊,只要是透過網路,就無法完全抹滅證據。

Frans de Waal: Morality Without Religion


source: bigthink 2013-05-22
A long tradition of thinking tells us that due to man's animal nature we need to have order imposed from above, in the form of religion. Without religion, we could not live together, and that is why all human societies believe in the supernatural and have developed one religion or another.

This view, which the biologist and primatologist Frans de Waal calls Veneer Theory, is an essentially pessimistic view "that morality is a thin veneer over a nasty human nature."

In his new book, The Bonobo and the Atheist: In Search of Humanism Among the Primates (http://goo.gl/OCus5), de Waal challenges this theory, arguing that human morality is older than religion, and indeed an innate quality. In other words, religion did not give us morality. Religion built onto a pre-existing moral system that governed how our species behaved.

de Waal's argument, which he has been making for years, is strengthened by the fact that recent research is starting to paint a better picture of the kind of cognitive processing that empathy requires. It turns out that empathy is not as complex as we had imagined, and that is why other animals are capable of it as well as humans.

So if being moral is so easy, can we dispatch with religion altogether?

That is an experiment that no one has tried, and which de Waal finds intriguing. The problem, as de Waal points out in the video, is that we need someone to be keeping watch in large-scale societies in which "we cannot all keep an eye on each other."

Transcript--
Well, religion is an interesting topic because religion is universal. All human societies believe in the supernatural. All human societies have a religion one way or another. Which for the biologists must mean that religion has some advantages -- offers some advantages to a society. Otherwise we wouldn't have that strong tendency to develop it. And so for me that's actually a far more interesting question of whether God exists or doesn't exist. That sort of question I cannot answer. But the question of why we have religions is an interesting question. And my view is that morality, our human morality, is older than religion so instead of saying morality comes from God or religion gave us morality. For me that's a big no-no.

Our current religions are just 2,000 or 3,000 years old which is very young. And our species is much older and I cannot imagine that, for example, a hundred thousand years or two hundred thousand years our ancestors did not have some type of morality. Of course they had rules about how you should behave, what is fair, what is unfair, caring for others -- all of these tendencies were in place already so they had a moral system and then at some point we developed these present day religions which I think we're sort of tacked on to the morality that we had. And maybe they served to codify them or to enforce them or to steer morality in a particular direction that we prefer.

So religion comes in for me secondarily. I'm struggling with whether we need religion. So personally I think we can be moral without religion because we probably had morality long before the current religions came along. So I think we can be moral without religion but in large scale societies where we are not all keeping an eye on each other because we -- in societies with a thousand people or several thousand or millions of people we cannot all keep an eye on each other. And that's maybe why we installed religions in these large scale societies where a God kept watch over everybody.

And then the question becomes is this really needed? Now in northern Europe -- I'm from the Netherlands -- there is basically an experiment going on. In northern Europe the majority of people are not religious anymore. When you ask them they say they're nonbelievers. And they still have a moral society as far as I can tell. And so there is a sort of experiment going on there -- can we set up a society where religion is not dominant at least? It may be present but it's not dominant anymore, there is still a moral society. And until now I think that experiment is going pretty well. And so I am optimistic that religion is not strictly needed. But I cannot be a hundred percent sure because we've never really tried -- there is no human society where religion is totally absent so we really have never tried this experiment.

Directed / Produced by Jonathan Fowler and Elizabeth Rodd

Robert Steven Kaplan: Who gets to define success?

source: bigthink 2013-06-04
http://goo.gl/P2Yk1 Who gets to define success?

Harvard Business School's Robert Steven Kaplan argues in his new book, What You're Really Meant to Do: A Roadmap for Reaching Your Unique Potential, that success is not about meeting someone else's definition, but reaching your potential by defining it on your own terms.

In this video series, Kaplan shares specific and actionable approaches to defining your own success and reaching your potential.

When it comes to improving your life and your career, it is essential to be able to properly evaluate your strengths and weaknesses.

Robert Kaplan explains how success is not about meeting someone else's definition of success, but defining it on your own terms.
Robert Steven Kaplan: Define Your Own Success

Robert Steven Kaplan: The Value of the Failure Story

Robert Steven Kaplan: Assessing Your Strengths and Weaknesses
Robert Steven Kaplan: The Importance of Building Strong Relationships

Lifestyle and Emotional Well-Being, with Dr. Andrew Weil


source: Big Think 2013-06-14
Anxiety and depression are widespread in the first world, but virtually unknown in agrarian societies. Why are people in developed nations increasingly unhappy? In this introduction to his Big Think Mentor (http://goo.gl/kVXvR) workshop on Spontaneous Happiness, Dr. Andrew Weil teaches a program designed to protect and enhance emotional well-being through a holistic approach to retraining body, mind, and spirit.

In this workshop, you'll learn to:
- Take a holistic and realistic approach to unlocking "spontaneous happiness." - Integrate Eastern and Western approaches to positive psychology.
- Use specific breathing exercises and meditations designed to develop mindfulness
- Optimize your diet to support emotional well-being
- Build physical habits that support emotional well-being

Paul Pholeros: How to reduce poverty? Fix homes


source: TEDtalksDirector 2013-06-20
In 1985, architect Paul Pholeros was challenged by the director of an Aboriginal-controlled health service to "stop people getting sick" in a small indigenous community in south Australia. The key insights: think beyond medicine and fix the local environment. In this sparky, interactive talk, Pholeros describes projects undertaken by Healthabitat, the organization he now runs to help reduce poverty -- through practical design fixes -- in Australia and beyond.

# with English subtitle: http://www.ted.com/talks/paul_pholeros_how_to_reduce_poverty_fix_homes.html

The idea of eliminating poverty is a great goal. I don't think anyone in this room would disagree. What worries me is when politicians with money and charismatic rock stars use the words, it all just sounds so, so simple.

Now, I've got no bucket of money today and I've got no policy to release, and I certainly haven't got a guitar. I'll leave that to others. But I do have an idea, and that idea is called Housing for Health.

Housing For Health works with poor people. It works in the places where they live, and the work is done to improve their health. Over the last 28 years, this tough, grinding, dirty workhas been done by literally thousands of people around Australia, and more recently overseas, and their work has proven that focused design can improve even the poorest living environments. It can improve health, and it can play a part in reducing, if not eliminating, poverty.

I'm going to start where the story began, 1985, in central Australia. A man called Yami Lester, an Aboriginal man, was running a health service. Eighty percent of what walked in the door, in terms of illness, was infectious disease -- third world, developing world infectious disease, caused by a poor living environment.


Yami assembled a team in Alice Springs. He got a medical doctor. He got an environmental health guy. And he hand-selected a team of local Aboriginal people to work on this project.Yami told us at that first meeting, there's no money. Always a good start, no money. You have six months. And I want you to start on a project which in his language he called "uwankara palyanku kanyintjaku," which, translated, is "a plan to stop people getting sick,"a profound brief. That was our task.

First step, the medical doctor went away for about six months, and he worked on what were to become these nine health goals, what were we aiming at. After six months of work, he came to my office and presented me with those nine words on a piece of paper.

[The 9 healthy living principles: Washing, clothes, wastewater, nutrition, crowding, animals+, dust, temperature, injury.]

Now, I was very, very unimpressed. Come on. Big ideas need big words and preferably a lot of them. This didn't fit the bill. What I didn't see and what you can't see is that he'd assembled thousands of pages of local, national and international health research that filled out the picture as to why these were the health targets.

The pictures that came a bit later had a very simple reason. The Aboriginal people who were our bosses and the senior people were most commonly illiterate, so the story had to be told in pictures of what were these goals. We work with the community, not telling them what was going to happen in a language they didn't understand.

So we had the goals, and each one of these goals -- and I won't go through them all — puts at the center the person and their health issue, and it then connects them to the bits of the physical environment that are actually needed to keep their health good. And the highest priority, you see on the screen, is washing people once a day, particularly children.

Now I hope most of you are thinking, "What? That sounds simple."

Now, I'm going to ask you all a very personal question. This morning before you came, who could have had a wash using a shower? I'm not going to ask if you had a shower, because I'm too polite. That's it. (Laughter) Okay. All right. I think it's fair to say, most people herecould have had a shower this morning.

I'm going to ask you to do some more work. I want you all to select one of the houses of the 25 houses you see on the screen. I want you to select one of them and note the position of that house and keep that in your head. Have you all got a house? I'm going to ask you to live there for a few months, so make sure you've got it right. It's in the northwest of Western Australia, very pleasant place.

Okay. Let's see if your shower in that house is working. I hear some "aw"s and I hear some "aah."

If you get a green tick, your shower's working. You and your kids are fine. If you get a red cross, well, I've looked carefully around the room and it's not going to make much difference to this crew. Why? Because you're all too old. And I know that's going to come as a shock to some of you, but you are. Now before you get offended and leave, I've got to say that being too old in this case means that pretty much everyone in the room, I think, is over five years of age.

We're really concerned with kids naught to five. And why? Washing is the antidote to the sort of bugs, the common infectious diseases of the eyes, the ears, the chest and the skinthat, if they occur in the first five years of life, permanently damage those organs. They leave a lifelong remnant. That means that, by the age of five, you can't see as well for the rest of your life. You can't hear as well for the rest of your life. You can't breath as well. You've lost a third of your lung capacity by the age of five. And even skin infection, which we originally thought wasn't that big a problem, mild skin infections naught to five give you a greatly increased chance of renal failure, needing dialysis at age 40. This is a big deal, so the ticks and crosses on the screen are actually critical for young kids.

Those ticks and crosses represent the 7,800 houses we've looked at nationally around Australia, the same proportion. What you see on the screen -- 35 percent of those not-so-famous houses lived in by 50,000 indigenous people, 35 percent had a working shower. Ten percent of those same 7,800 houses had safe electrical systems, and 58 percent of those houses had a working toilet. These are by a simple, standard test: In the case of the shower, does it have hot and cold water, two taps that work, a shower rose to get water onto your head or onto your body, and a drain that takes the water away? Not well designed, not beautiful, not elegant -- just that they function. And the same test for the electrical system and the toilets.

Housing for Health projects aren't about measuring failure. They're actually about improving houses. We start on day one of every project -- we've learned, we don't make promises, we don't do reports. We arrive in the morning with tools, tons of equipment, trades, and we train up a local team on the first day to start work. By the evening of the first day, a few housesin that community are better than when we started in the morning.

Lesley Hazleton: The doubt essential to faith


source: TEDtalksDirector 2013-06-24
When Lesley Hazleton was writing a biography of Muhammad, she was struck by something: The night he received the revelation of the Koran, according to early accounts, his first reaction was doubt, awe, even fear. And yet this experience became the bedrock of his belief. Hazleton calls for a new appreciation of doubt and questioning as the foundation of faith -- and an end to fundamentalism of all kinds.

# with English subtitle:
http://www.ted.com/talks/lesley_hazleton_the_doubt_essential_to_faith.html

Writing biography is a strange thing to do. It's a journey into the foreign territory of somebody else's life, a journey, an exploration that can take you places you never dreamed of going and still can't quite believe you've been, especially if, like me, you're an agnostic Jew and the life you've been exploring is that of Muhammad.

Five years ago, for instance, I found myself waking each morning in misty Seattle to what I knew was an impossible question: What actually happened one desert night, half the world and almost half of history away? What happened, that is, on the night in the year 610 when Muhammad received the first revelation of the Koran on a mountain just outside Mecca?This is the core mystical moment of Islam, and as such, of course, it defies empirical analysis. Yet the question wouldn't let go of me. I was fully aware that for someone as secular as I am, just asking it could be seen as pure chutzpah. (Laughter) And I plead guilty as charged, because all exploration, physical or intellectual, is inevitably in some sense an act of transgression, of crossing boundaries.

Still, some boundaries are larger than others. So a human encountering the divine, as Muslims believe Muhammad did, to the rationalist, this is a matter not of fact but of wishful fiction, and like all of us, I like to think of myself as rational.

Which might be why when I looked at the earliest accounts we have of that night, what struck me even more than what happened was what did not happen. Muhammad did not come floating off the mountain as though walking on air. He did not run down shouting, "Hallelujah!" and "Bless the Lord!" He did not radiate light and joy. There were no choirs of angels, no music of the spheres, no elation, no ecstasy, no golden aura surrounding him,no sense of an absolute, fore-ordained role as the messenger of God. That is, he did none of the things that might make it easy to cry foul, to put down the whole story as a pious fable.Quite the contrary. In his own reported words, he was convinced at first that what had happened couldn't have been real. At best, he thought, it had to have been a hallucination --a trick of the eye or the ear, perhaps, or his own mind working against him. At worst, possession -- that he'd been seized by an evil jinn, a spirit out to deceive him, even to crush the life out of him. In fact, he was so sure that he could only be majnun, possessed by a jinn, that when he found himself still alive, his first impulse was to finish the job himself, to leap off the highest cliff and escape the terror of what he'd experienced by putting an end to all experience.

So the man who fled down the mountain that night trembled not with joy but with a stark, primordial fear. He was overwhelmed not with conviction, but by doubt. And that panicked disorientation, that sundering of everything familiar, that daunting awareness of somethingbeyond human comprehension, can only be called a terrible awe.

This might be somewhat difficult to grasp now that we use the word "awesome" to describe a new app or a viral video. With the exception perhaps of a massive earthquake, we're protected from real awe. We close the doors and hunker down, convinced that we're in control, or, at least, hoping for control. We do our best to ignore the fact that we don't always have it, and that not everything can be explained. Yet whether you're a rationalist or a mystic, whether you think the words Muhammad heard that night came from inside himself or from outside, what's clear is that he did experience them, and that he did so with a force that would shatter his sense of himself and his world and transform this otherwise modest man into a radical advocate for social and economic justice. Fear was the only sane response, the only human response.

Too human for some, like conservative Muslim theologians who maintain that the account of his wanting to kill himself shouldn't even be mentioned, despite the fact that it's in the earliest Islamic biographies. They insist that he never doubted for even a single moment, let alone despaired. Demanding perfection, they refuse to tolerate human imperfection. Yet what, exactly, is imperfect about doubt? As I read those early accounts, I realized it wasprecisely Muhammad's doubt that brought him alive for me, that allowed me to begin to see him in full, to accord him the integrity of reality. And the more I thought about it, the more it made sense that he doubted, because doubt is essential to faith.

If this seems a startling idea at first, consider that doubt, as Graham Greene once put it, is the heart of the matter. Abolish all doubt, and what's left is not faith, but absolute, heartless conviction. You're certain that you possess the Truth -- inevitably offered with an implied uppercase T -- and this certainty quickly devolves into dogmatism and righteousness, by which I mean a demonstrative, overweening pride in being so very right, in short, the arrogance of fundamentalism. It has to be one of the multiple ironies of history that a favorite expletive of Muslim fundamentalists is the same one once used by the Christian fundamentalists known as Crusaders: "infidel," from the Latin for "faithless." Doubly ironic, in this case, because their absolutism is in fact the opposite of faith. In effect, they are the infidels. Like fundamentalists of all religious stripes, they have no questions, only answers.They found the perfect antidote to thought and the ideal refuge of the hard demands of real faith. They don't have to struggle for it like Jacob wrestling through the night with the angel,or like Jesus in his 40 days and nights in the wilderness, or like Muhammad, not only that night on the mountain, but throughout his years as a prophet, with the Koran constantly urging him not to despair, and condemning those who most loudly proclaim that they know everything there is to know and that they and they alone are right.

And yet we, the vast and still far too silent majority, have ceded the public arena to this extremist minority. We've allowed Judaism to be claimed by violently messianic West Bank settlers, Christianity by homophobic hypocrites and misogynistic bigots, Islam by suicide bombers. And we've allowed ourselves to be blinded to the fact that no matter whether they claim to be Christians,

Terry Young: Using Big Data to Spot Big Trends


source: Big Think 2013-06-25
All across the Internet, we see little memes popping up, and then petering out. A savvy Internet user might be able to use her intuition to spot the memes that have staying power, but identifying these memes in isolation, while perhaps interesting, is not very useful.

"What makes it useful and what makes it actionable," says Terry Young, founder and CEO of sparks & honey, a data-driven advertising newsroom, "is when you cluster multiple things that look similar together and you begin to analyze the patterns and you begin to quantify it."

In other words, when you are trying to spot a future trend you need to find an organizing principle that surounds it. Macrotrends, as Young explains in the video below, are like living, dynamic organisms. At sparks & honey, Young's team uses data analysis to track the subtle movements of 60 macrotrends. "We use those clusters in order to build content and build relevance for a brand," he says.

Transcript -- When you're trying to predict a future trend you need an organizing principle. And what we have done is created 60 macrotrends. We believe that these are living organisms and that they shift and they shape and they're dynamic in nature, almost like a neuro network exists under each macrotrend. So if I threw out the macrotrend like superhuman or robo apocalypse or living matter, we track on a daily basis all of the little subtle movements that happen, the shifts in consumer conversations, the shifts in influencers, the shifts in new scientific studies that support that macrotrend. And we score each of those components.

The importance of that is that it allows us to understand the dynamic nature and take -- use big data, which feeds in, use real time examples -- we connect it into our network of 60 macrotrends and then we use those clusters in order to build content and build relevance for a brand.

For a macrotrend to be born we have to see X number of manifestations in the marketplace. And it varies by category, but when we have enough activity clustered together we create a new macrotrend. Sometimes these are born from an existing macrotrend, but the things that we watch -- there's a couple of pieces. One is we watch very closely the patterns that we see. The second, we watch for the things that are accelerating the movement.

For every trend there's an accelerator and there's a balancer. And the accelerators -- if you imagine sensor network, which is the idea of taking small little sensors, embedding them into dumb products and making them smart products, one of the things that is accelerating that is everything that's happening around robotics, artificial intelligence, everything that's happening around super human, bionics, singularity movement, so forth and so on. On the flip side, though, we have content networks like digital detox, where people are running away from digital so that they can remove digital from their lives, or incognito, where people are trying to look for ways of masking themselves so that they can have a greater level of privacy, or robo apocalypse, which is the fear that robots are going to take over our world, and you see it manifesting in entertainment, popular culture and books.

Without organizing principle, basically what happens is this: brands see something that burst in culture and they're like, "That's really interesting." And they do nothing with it. Why? Because anything that bursts in isolation is not useful. It's just interesting. What makes it useful and what makes it acitionable is when you cluster multiple things that look similar together and you begin to analyze the patterns and you begin to quantify it.

Directed / Produced by Jonathan Fowler & Elizabeth Rodd

Peter Attia: What if we're wrong about diabetes?


source: TEDtalksDirector      2013-06-25
As a young ER doctor, Peter Attia felt contempt for a patient with diabetes. She was overweight, he thought, and thus responsible for the fact that she needed a foot amputation. But years later, Attia received an unpleasant medical surprise that led him to wonder: is our understanding of diabetes right? Could the precursors to diabetes cause obesity, and not the other way around? A look at how assumptions may be leading us to wage the wrong medical war.

# with English subtitles: http://www.ted.com/talks/peter_attia_what_if_we_re_wrong_about_diabetes.html

Dr. Andrew Weil: The Pursuit of Happiness | Big Think Mentor


source: Big Think 2013-06-24

In his Big Think Mentor (http://goo.gl/kVXvR) workshop on Spontaneous Happiness, Dr. Andrew Weil teaches a program designed to protect and enhance emotional well-being through a holistic approach to retraining body, mind, and spirit.

In this workshop, you'll learn to:

- Take a holistic and realistic approach to unlocking "spontaneous happiness."
- Integrate Eastern and Western approaches to positive psychology.
- Use specific breathing exercises and meditations designed to develop mindfulness
- Optimize your diet to support emotional well-being
- Build physical habits that support emotional well-being

The word happiness, derived from a Norse root meaning luck or fortune, encapsulates the essential flaw in how most of us go about looking for it. We tend to view happiness as an all-or-nothing, potentially permanent state, and as something that's visited upon or snatched away from us by chance. Lost your job? You're unhappy. Just fell in love? Happy. The idea that "true happiness" is of a uniformly high emotional pitch, and our tendency to expect it from external things ironically ends up causing us a great deal of suffering.

The holistic health practitioner Dr. Andrew Weil, along with most psychologists these days, more often uses the term well-being, which recognizes that a wide range of emotions are possible and perfectly normal in a psychologically healthy person. Weil goes even farther, citing research that suggests that the common, non-crippling form of depression, usually treated as a pathology, may actually be an evolutionary adaptation that helps people with focus and problem solving.

In Spontaneous Happiness, his five-part workshop for Big Think Mentor, Weil teaches a program designed to protect and enhance emotional well-being through specific lifestyle changes. You'll learn to:

- Take a holistic and realistic approach to unlocking "spontaneous happiness."
- Integrate Eastern and Western approaches to positive psychology.
- Use specific breathing exercises and meditations designed to develop mindfulness
- Optimize your diet to support emotional well-being
- Build physical habits that support emotional well-being

2013-09-14

Margaret Atwood on Faith and Reason (with Bill Moyers on PBS)

source: PBS    2006-07-21
On Bill Moyers on Faith & Reason, airing Friday, July 28 at 9 p.m. on PBS (check local listings), writers Margaret Atwood and Martin Amis show how the imagination of the creative mind can help cross the boundaries between faith and reason and to see the best and worst of human possibilities. Atwood's most famous novel, The Handmaid's Tale, depicts a democracy transformed into a theocracy of God-quoting true believers who strip women of their rights. Bill Moyers explores how these two confessed agnostics come to grips with a world immersed in belief.

For more of the interviews, and a chance to share what *you* find important on matters of Faith & Reason, visit the program's website (www.pbs.org/moyers) and watch the broadcasts on PBS.

For the complete interview and more of Atwood's viewpoints on faith, reason, science, religion, and some other relevant issues:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/faithandreason/watch_atwood.html

source: aluckypunk



about Margaret Atwood:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Atwood

Albert Einstein on God


source: dracumelenios 2009-12-22
This video discusses the spiritual beliefs of Prof. Albert Einstein and how they have been a subject for debate in recent years.

Stephen Hawking: God Didn't Create The Universe


source: PrinceOfLogic  2010-09-02
Stephen Hawking makes the claim in his new book Grand Design (to be published next week). The media took the story to mystifying heights... I thought we knew that one does does not need God in physics since the time of Laplace?

Dr Michio Kaku on Immortality, The Bible, and Scientific Evidence of Geo...


source: ScientiaMathema

Who lives in the eleventh dimension? - Parallel Universes


source: BBCWorldwide  2008-10-01

Scientists discuss what sort of life could be found in the eleventh dimension. With talk of world of lightning bolts, electricity, unstable atoms and more, this video from BBC show 'Parallel Universe' is full of mind-bending theories to set your imagination racing.

Questions no one knows the answers to - Chris Anderson


source: TED-Ed 2012-03-11
View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/questions-n...
In the first of a new TED-Ed series designed to catalyze curiosity, TED Curator Chris Anderson shares his boyhood obsession with quirky questions that seem to have no answers.
Lesson by Chris Anderson, animation by Andrew Park.

Multiverse Theory by Dr Michio Kaku


source: ScientiaMathema

Michio Kaku: 3 types of Civilizations


source: RazorRiot77

Michio Kaku: WIll We Ever Be a Galactic Civilization?


source: TheCircuitMojoHD  2008-05-26
WIll We Ever Be a Galactic Civilization?
Asked the biggest question that he would like answered, Physicist Michio Kaku answers:
Will we survive long enough as a species to evolve into an advanced "type 1" civilization?

Michio Kaku: A Black Hole in Our Own Backyard?


source: Big Think  2012-03-27
A wandering black hole may catch up with us one day and eat us for breakfast and it wouldn't even burp in the process.

Parallel Universes (平行宇宙)

source: Phystory Channel
Parallel Universes is a 2001 documentary produced by the BBC's Horizon series. The documentary has to do with parallel universes, string theory, M theory, supergravity, and other theoretical physics concepts. Participants include Michio Kaku, Paul Steinhardt, and other physicists.

About quantum theory / 量子力學理論 (explained by Michio Kaku)


source: llllll0o   2009年2月14日

NASA | Colliding Galaxies


source: Libera Scienza  2012-06-15
http://www.facebook.com/liberascienza

Galaxies were built up through collisions and mergers, but this process isn't over - and our own Milky Way galaxy provides a prime example of how it continues today. Credit: NASA/GSFC

Credit: NASA / GSFC
JWST Web Feature: Colliding Galaxies
Written By: Frank Reddy
Produced By: Mike McClare
Release Date: September 28, 2010
Total Run Time: 03:57.00

Transcription:
Galaxies are the building blocks of the universe. The giant galaxies we see today - even our own - were built up from many smaller galaxies. But construction isn't done yet. It continues even today.
Full-grown galaxies approach and interact with each other. They may collide and eventually merge. As the galaxies approach, the tug of gravity creates tides that distort their shapes. Stars and gas stream into new orbits.
Sometimes, they're completely ejected, trailing into the depths of intergalactic space.
Gas clouds compressed in the chaos light up with intense rounds of star formation.
Because stars create most of the chemical elements, such episodes have a profound effect on a galaxy's chemical makeup.
This infrared image of the entire sky shows half a billion stars. Most are in our galaxy.
Some are not. These are companion galaxies that orbit our Milky Way.
And some are in between. In 1994, astronomers discovered that some of these stars actually belong to ...a different galaxy. It's called the Sagittarius Dwarf Elliptical, and the Milky Way is tearing it apart.
As the dwarf galaxy passes through the Milky Way's disk, gravitational tides stretch the dwarf's stars into long streams that wrap around the galaxy's orbit. For the dwarf, it's a fatal attraction.
For the Milky Way, it's but one of many similar events that shaped our home galaxy.
But there's something much bigger headed our way.
M31, the Andromeda Galaxy. This is no dwarf. It's the Milky Way's biggest neighbor; of roughly the same size, mass and type.
Astronomers say the crash will begin about 2 billion years from now. This supercomputer simulation shows how the event may unfold over billions of years.
The first pass distorts the two great spirals. Stars are tossed into the intergalactic night like sparks thrown from a campfire. Our sun, complete with planets in tow, could be similarly ejected.
Each pass blurs the identities of each galaxy. Eventually, Andromeda and the Milky Way will merge into a single entity some astronomers call "Milkomeda."
How did the shape, structure, and chemical content of galaxies change over the sweep of cosmic history?
Deep surveys by the James Webb Space Telescope will capture the full panorama, from the earliest dwarfs that formed to the familiar galaxies we see around us today.

The discovery of the Higgs Boson? Garrett Lisi explains


source: Singularity University  2012-07-04
Following the CERN announcement, Theoretical physicist Garrett Lisi explains the discovery of the Higgs Boson particle by CERN scientists. Previously, LHC results have strongly signaled the existence of a Higgs with a mass of 125 gigaelectronvolts (GeV), or roughly 125 times more massive than the proton.
Read the full article here:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/singulari...
http://singularityhub.com/2012/07/04/...

'The God Particle': The Higgs Boson


source: Best0fScience 2009-12-18
http://www.facebook.com/ScienceReason ... The Standard Model of Particle Physics (Chapter 8): The Higgs Mechanism.

More about "Higgs Boson"

Michio Kaku speaks on "Higgs Boson"
source: KaluzaPryme

What is a Higgs Boson? - Physicist Michio Kaku responds
source: CNN


What next?
source: Luc Anderssen


2012-07-04
Dr. Kaku aborda a questão de saber se o chamado Bóson de Higgs, ou "Partícula de Deus" foi exagerada, e que sua descoberta significa para a Física.

O Bóson de Higgs foi revelado como detectado no dia 04 de Julho de 2012 pelo CERN (Centro Europeu de Pesquisa Nuclear).

Línk original do vídeo : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQaHVm...

Michio Kaku on Solar Revolution


source:  Big Think 2012-04-24
Michio Kaku: I believe in solar power, but there are problems that we have to face, and one of them is low efficiency.

Michio Kaku: Some people think that the time is right for the solar revolution, that one day solar power will replace oil and we'll all live in a world that is clean and renewable. Well, not so fast. I believe in solar power. However, there are problems that we have to face, and one of them is low efficiency. The other one is lack of a storage facility like a battery. That's' the weak link. We simply don't have the efficiency of solar cells necessary to make it economical and competitive today, and the ability to store the energy for long periods of time when the sun is dark, when there are clouds and your solar panels don't work.So my point of view is this: I think in the coming decade, as oil prices start to rise and as the cost of wind and solar and renewables start to drop, the two currents will probably cross in maybe ten years. So in ten years it will be the marketplace which then begins to drive the whole thing forward because of the dropping cost of solar cells and rising efficiency and the rising price of oil. Now, why do I believe that oil prices will rise? Because of something called Hubbert's Peak. Hubbert was a Shell Oil engineer way back in the 1960s who predicted that we would hit the halfway point for the production of oil in the United States and after that the bell-shaped curve would curve the other way and we would become an importer of oil. Well, people laughed at him because they said that, "Well, wait a minute. We have Alaska. We have Texas. We have lots of oil fields, and so we're not going to hit the 50% point. America will always export oil." Well, wrong. Hubbert hit it right on the nose to within the year at which US oil supplies peaked and then it went to the other side of the bell-shaped curve. That's called Hubbert's Peak, when we hit the 50% point. Now we know that Hubbard was right and the next big question is, are we hitting Hubbert's Peak for world oil production? That is the $64,000 question. Many people that I've talked to, senior oil analysts, energy analysts, say that we are either at Hubbert's Peak or within ten years of hitting Hubbert's Peak. Now some people say, "Well that's stupid. We discover new oil deposits all the time. Look at Canada. We have tar sands of Canada, right?" Wrong. It turns out that we will always have oil. We will never run out of oil, except oil will become more expensive as we go down the other side of Hubbert's Peak. We would have to discover a new Saudi Arabia every five to ten years in order for this curve to simply go on forever. That's not going to happen. I don't care how many tar sands you're talking about in Canada. You're not going to create a new Saudi Arabia, which produces very clean, very cheap oil, oil that is prized by the oil companies because it is relatively less polluting and has tremendous amounts of profits associated with it. So we do know that oil prices will fluctuate because of politics, but on average it will start to rise because we will be hitting Hubbert's Peak. Meanwhile, solar power is going to become cheaper and in 10 years or so the two curves could actually cross, and in 20 years a new game changer arrives and that is fusion power. The Europeans are betting the store on the ITER fusion reactor to be built outside Cadarache, France in Southern France, and if we have the power of the sun on the earth then sea water could drive all our machines. So if this scenario plays out as I predict, it means that global warming could actually be a problem only for the next several decades as we enter the solar era and the fusion era. The problem is we have already lofted so much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, and we will continue to do so for decades to come, that even before we enter the solar age and the fusion age we will have so much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that we will really screw up the weather. But on a long-term basis I think that solar energy and fusion power will be the solution, the ultimate solution, for the greenhouse problem.
 Directed / Produced byJonathan Fowler & Elizabeth Rodd

Vernor Vinge


source: Singularity University 2012-07-19
Summary of his lecture here: http://singularityhub.com/2012/07/17/...

Vernor Vinge - a techno-optimist.


source: Singularity University  2012-07-19
A brief interview with Vernor Vinge at Singularity University. Vinge gives his insights on life, groupminds, the future, and of course, the Singularity.
Article here: http://singularityhub.com/2012/07/17/...

Michio Kaku: The Dark Side of Technology


source: Big Think 2012-05-11
http://bigthink.com/
Dr. Michio Kaku addresses this question: What is the most dangerous technology?
Directed / Produced by Jonathan Fowler and Elizabeth Rodd

Michio Kaku: What Is Déjà Vu?


source: Big Think 2011-11-15
http://bigthink.com

Dr. Michio Kaku explains one theory behind déjà vu and asks, "Is it ever possible on any scale to perhaps flip between different universes?"

Michio Kaku: In the Future, We Will Wear the Internet


source: Big Think 2011-11-15
http://bigthink.com
When will we be able to enter a room and create an imaginary scenario so realistic that it seems as if we are really there? Sooner than you think, says Dr. Kaku.

Demystifying the Higgs Boson with Leonard Susskind


source: StanfordUniversity 2012-08-16
(July 30, 2012) Professor Susskind presents an explanation of what the Higgs mechanism is, and what it means to "give mass to particles." He also explains what's at stake for the future of physics and cosmology.
Stanford University: http://www.stanford.edu/

Stanford University Channel on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/stanford

Michio Kaku: What Put the Bang in the Big Bang?


source: Big Think 2012-08-30
What is the Higgs boson? Michio Kaku describes the so-called "God particle" as a fuse. "It's a match. It's the spark that set off the Big Bang. It put the bang in the Big Bang."

Transcript--
A few months ago the headlines were dominated by the fact that physicists think they found the Higgs boson. Well, the media said, this is a great discovery, but what do you mean you think you found the Higgs boson? Well, to within five standard deviations, yes, we think we found the Higgs boson. And the media said, what do you mean by that?

Well I would have answered the question differently. I would have said, "With 99.9999% confidence, we have bagged the Higgs boson. If you are an odds maker in Las Vegas, and the bets are that you are 99.9999% confident that you have it, then yes, you have it."

So experimental data is not ironclad. You have a bell-shaped curve of information, a bell-shaped curve where the data indicates that you're sitting right here on the top of the bell-shaped curve, but as you go away from the bell-shaped curve, you undergo one standard deviation, two standard deviations, three standard deviations . . . and here we have five standard deviations of proof. So in physics we use that as the gold standard: if you can say you found something within five standard deviations, then it means that, within 99.9999% accuracy, you have actually found it. Most people would say, of course you have found it.

The Higgs boson is important not just because it gives particles mass. That's how the media played it, and people say, well, so what; ten billion dollars for another god darn subatomic particle that gives us mass; what's the big deal; why call it the God particle; why say that it's one of the great achievements of modern science? Well, you have to understand something: we physicists squirm when we hear "God particle," but, you see, there is some truth to the name "the God particle" because the Bible says that God set the universe into motion. That's what God did in Genesis, chapter one, verse one. However, we physicists say that the universe was created in a big bang 13.7 billion years ago. But then the question is, why did it bang? What set off the bang? We don't know. It's a big mystery. Well, the answer is a Higgs-like boson set off the Big Bang. It put the bang in the Big Bang.

See, the purpose of Higgs bosons—and there is more than one—the purpose of the Higgs boson is to break a symmetry. And when you break symmetries like the symmetry of the universe, then you get big bangs. So what is the Higgs boson? The Higgs boson is a fuse. It's a match. It's the spark that set off the Big Bang. It put the bang in the Big Bang.

Directed / Produced by
Elizabeth Rodd and Jonathan Fowler

The Extended Mind: Recent Experimental Evidence (by Rupert Sheldrake)


source: GoogleTechTalks 2008-09-05
Google Tech Talks September 2, 2008

ABSTRACT
We have been brought up to believe that the mind is located inside the head. But there are good reasons for thinking that this view is too limited. Recent experimental results show that people can influence others at a distance just by looking at them, even if they look from behind and if all sensory clues are eliminated. And people's intentions can be detected by animals from miles away. The commonest kind of non-local interaction mental influence occurs in connection with telephone calls, where most people have had the experience of thinking of someone shortly before they ring. Controlled, randomized tests on telephone telepathy have given highly significant positive results. Research techniques have now been automated and experiments on telepathy are now being conducted through the internet and cell phones, enabling widespread participation.

Speaker: Rupert Sheldrake
Rupert Sheldrake, Ph.D. is a biologist and author of more than 75 technical papers and ten books, the most recent being The Sense of Being Stared At. He studied at Cambridge and Harvard Universities, was a Fellow of Clare College, Cambridge and a Research Fellow of the Royal Society. He is currently Director of the Perrott-Warrick project, funded from Trinity College Cambridge.

Michio Kaku: Space Bubble Baths and the Free Universe


source: bigthink 2013-02-06
How can you create a universe from nothing? Well if you calculate the total matter of the universe it is positive. If you calculate the total energy of the universe it is negative because of gravity. Gravity has negative energy. When you add the two together what do you get? Zero, so it takes no energy to create a universe. Universes are for free. A universe is a free lunch.

Michio Kaku: We have found the Higgs boson. So then the next question is what's next? Well the Large Hadron Collider, this machine that is 27 miles in circumference, costing 10 billion dollars is big enough to create the next generation of particles. So the Higgs boson in some sense is the last hurrah for the old physics, the old physics of what is called the standard model, which gives us quarks and electrons. The new theory is going to take us into dark matter. Now we know dark matter exists. Dark matter is invisible, so if I held it in my hand you wouldn't see it. In fact, it would go right through my fingers, go right through the rock underneath my feet and go all the way to China. It would reverse direction and come back from China all the way here to New York City and go back and forth.

So dark matter has gravitational attraction, but it is invisible and we are clueless as to what dark matter really is. The leading candidate for dark matter today is called the sparticle. The sparticle is the next octave of the string. Now look around you. Everything around you, we think, is nothing but the lowest vibration of a vibrating string, the lowest octave in some sense, but a string of course has higher octaves, higher notes. We think that dark matter could in fact be nothing but a higher vibration of the string. So we think that 23% of the universe, which is the dark matter's contribution to the universe, comes from a higher octave of the string. Now the standard model which we have ample verification of only represents four percent of the universe. So the universe of atoms, protons, neutrons, neutrinos - that universe only represents four percent of what there is. 23% is dark matter, which we think is the next vibration up of the string and then 73% of the universe is dark energy.

Dark energy is the energy of nothing. It's the energy of the vacuum. Between two objects in outer space there is nothing, nothing except dark energy, dark energy, which is pushing the galaxies apart. So when people say if the universe is expanding they say two things, what's pushing the galaxies apart and what is the universe expanding into. Well what's pushing the galaxies apart is dark energy, the energy of nothing. Even vacuum has energy pushing the galaxies apart. And then what is the universe expanding into? Well if the universe is a sphere of some sort and we live on the skin of the sphere and the sphere is expanding what is the sphere expanding into? Well obviously a bubble, a balloon expands into the third dimension even though the people living on the balloon are two dimensional.

So when our universe expands what does it expand into? Hyperspace, a dimension beyond what you can see and touch. In fact, string theory predicts that there are 11 dimensions of hyperspace, so we're nothing but a soap bubble floating in a bubble bath of soap bubbles and so in some sense the multiverse can be likened to a bubble bath. Our universe is nothing but one bubble, but there are other bubbles. When two bubbles collide that could merge into a bigger bubble, which could be the big bang. In fact, that is what probably the big bang is or perhaps a bubble fissioned in half and split off into two bubbles. That could be the big bang. Or perhaps the universe popped into existence out of nothing. That is also a possibility.

And so the universe could essentially be nothingness, which was unstable and created a soap bubble Now you may say to yourself well that can't be right because that violates the conservation of matter and energy. How can you create a universe from nothing? Well if you calculate the total matter of the universe it is positive. If you calculate the total energy of the universe it is negative because of gravity. Gravity has negative energy. When you add the two together what do you get? Zero, so it takes no energy to create a universe. Universes are for free. A universe is a free lunch. And then you may say to yourself well that can't be right because positive and negative charges don't cancel out, therefore, how can the universe be made out of nothing. Well if you calculate the total amount of positive charge in the universe and calculate the total amount of negative charge in the universe and you add it up what do you get? Zero, the universe has zero charge. Well what about spin? Galaxies spin, right? But they spin in all directions. If you add up all the spins of the galaxies what do you get? Zero, so in other words, the universe has zero spin, zero charge and zero matter energy content. In other words, the universe is for free.

Directed / Produced byJonathan Fowler & Elizabeth Rodd

Michio Kaku: Can We Resurrect the Dinosaurs? Neanderthal Man?


source: Big Think 2012-09-20
Dr. Kaku answers the question of whether it is possible to resurrect the dinosaurs by "turning on" their ancient genes? Moreover, now that we have also sequenced the genes of the Neanderthal man, at some point in the future it may be possible to bring him back. And then of course, if a young Neanderthal boy is born then the question is where do you put the boy, in a zoo or at Harvard?

Transcript--
Michio Kaku: We have taken cells from the carcass of an animal that died decades ago and brought them back to life and so it is possible using today's technology to take bodies, carcasses of animals that died decades ago and resurrect them in the form of clones. Now we have also sequenced the genes of the Neanderthal man, meaning that at some point in the future it may be possible to bring back the Neanderthal man. In fact, at Harvard University one professor even made a proposal as to how much it would cost to reassemble the genome of the Neanderthal man. And then of course, if a young Neanderthal boy is born then the question is where do you put the boy, in a zoo or at Harvard?
This is a question that we're going to be facing in the coming decades because it is possible that we might be able to bring back the mammoths. We're talking about creatures that walked the surface of the earth tens of thousands of years ago and we have their genome and it's a serious proposal now that we're closing in on sequencing all the genes of a mammoth to bring the mammoth - by inserting a fertilized egg inside the womb of an elephant and having an elephant give birth to a mammoth.
Now dinosaurs are much more difficult. They perished 65 million years ago, not tens of thousands of years ago. However, something has happened that I thought would not happen in my lifetime and that is we have soft tissue from the dinosaurs. I never thought it would be possible in my lifetime. If you take a hadrosaur and crack open the thigh bones, bingo. You find soft tissue right there in the bone marrow. Who would have thought? T-Rex's too and scientists have analyzed not the DNA, but the proteins inside the soft tissue. Not surprisingly, we find the proteins of chickens and also frogs and reptiles, which means of course that dinosaurs we can now show biochemically are very closely related to birds. In fact, we think birds are dinosaurs that survived the cataclysm of 65 million years ago.
Now there is another proposal to use what is called epigenetics. Nature does not simply throw away good genes. Nature simply turns them off. For example, we have the genes in our own body that would put hair all over our body and you can actually turn that gene and create, quote, unquote, a werewolf. In fact, in Mexico City there are two young boys with hair all over their bodies that are acrobats in a circus and scientists have sequenced the genes and yes, it is a very ancient gene that they have.
With chickens we can actually see the genes for chickens that were turned off because of epigenetics, genes that give webbing between the toes of a chicken because a long time ago chickens had webbed feet and also teeth. You can actually bring back teeth inside chickens. So then the question is, is it possible to make the next big leap to use epigenetics, to use gene therapy, to use all the different kinds of therapies we have, mix all these things up in the memory of a computer and have the computer give the best fit for a reptile that is like a dinosaur, insert that perhaps, into the womb of maybe an alligator or a whatever and perhaps give birth to an egg, which will hatch something resembling a dinosaur.
Well that's not possible today, but it's not out of the question. It's not out of the question that at some point in the future we'll use a computer to take all these bits of DNA from living lizards, from the—extracting information from the proteins of soft tissue from hadrosaurs and assemble the best mathematical approximation to a dinosaur and have it give birth to an egg.

Directed / Produced by Elizabeth Rodd and Jonathan Fowler