1. Clicking ▼&► to (un)fold the tree menu may facilitate locating what you want to find. 2. Videos embedded here do not necessarily represent my viewpoints or preferences. 3. This is just one of my several websites. Please click the category-tags below these two lines to go to each independent website.
source: Philosophical Overdose 2016年12月24日 In this episode of In Our Time, Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss Anarchism and why its political ideas became synonymous with chaos and disorder. Pierre Joseph Proudhon famously declared “property is theft”. And perhaps more surprisingly that “Anarchy is order”. Speaking in 1840, he was the first self-proclaimed anarchist. Anarchy comes from the Greek word “anarchos”, meaning “without rulers”, and the movement draws on the ideas of philosophers like William Godwin and John Locke. It is also prominent in Taoism, Buddhism and other religions. In Christianity, for example, St Paul said there is no authority except God. The anarchist rejection of a ruling class inspired communist thinkers too. Peter Kropotkin, a Russian prince and leading anarcho-communist, led this rousing cry in 1897: “Either the State for ever, crushing individual and local life... Or the destruction of States and new life starting again.. on the principles of the lively initiative of the individual and groups and that of free agreement. The choice lies with you!” In the Spanish Civil War, anarchists embarked on the largest experiment to date in organising society along anarchist principles. Although it ultimately failed, it was not without successes along the way. So why has anarchism become synonymous with chaos and disorder? What factors came together to make the 19th century and early 20th century the high point for its ideas? How has its philosophy influenced other movements from The Diggers and Ranters to communism, feminism and eco-warriors? With John Keane, Professor of Politics at Westminster University; Ruth Kinna, Senior Lecturer in Politics at Loughborough University; Peter Marshall, philosopher and historian.
source: Philosophical Overdose 2016年12月19日
In this episode of In Our Time, Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the Social Contract and ask a foundational question of political philosophy – by what authority does a government govern? “Man was born free and he is everywhere in chains”. So begins Jean Jacques Rousseau’s great work on the Social Contract. Rousseau was trying to understand why a man would give up his natural freedoms and bind himself to the rule of a prince or a government. But the idea of the social contract - that political authority is held through a contract with those to be ruled - began before Rousseau with the work of John Locke, Hugo Grotius and even Plato. We explore how an idea that burgeoned among the 17th century upheavals of the English civil war and then withered in the face of modern capitalist society still influences our attitude to government today. With Melissa Lane, Senior University Lecturer in History at Cambridge University; Susan James, Professor of Philosophy at Birkbeck College, University of London; Karen O’Brien, Professor of English Literature at the University of Warwick http://www.bbc.co.uk.
MIRACLES IN DISPUTE WITH TIM HULL 22:20
KARL BARTH AND CONTEMPORARY THEOLOGY BY TOM GREGGS 25:00
JOHN LOCKE. THEOLOGY,ETHICS & POLITICS BY JOHN PERRY 25:00
AUGUSTINE BY JANET SOSKICE PART 1 25:01
LACAN BY MARCUS POUND 22:39
LUTHER part2 with ALEC RYRIE 23:37
MARTIN LUTHER BY PROF ALEC RYRIE 25:29
CHRISTIAN ETHICS BY SAM WELLS 24:55
COLERIDGE & ROMANTICISM BY DOUGLAS HEDLEY 25:00
EVANGELICALISM BY DAVID HILBORN 24:56
RITSCHL BY CLIVE MARSH 25:00
STANLEY HAUERWAS BY DARREN SARISKY 24:58
ANTHONY THISELTON HIS MAJOR WORKS AN INTERVIEW 2012 24:53
NOUVELLE THEOLOGIE, DE LUBAC & RADICAL ORTHODOXY BY SIMON OLIVER 13:59
DAVID F FORD THE FUTURE OF CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY 24:41
THEOLOGICAL AESTHETICS BY BEN QUASH 24:58
WITTGENSTEIN STEPHEN MULHALL 25:00
DAVID FORD MODERN THEOLOGY 24:59
PAUL TILLICH BY RUSSELL RE MANNING 23:52
WHY BELIEVE? By JOHN COTTINGHAM 23:11
SIMONE WEIL STEPHEN PLANT 24:59
NIETZSCHE'S CRITIQUE OF CHRISTIANITY STEPHEN N WILLIAMS 24:07
IMMANUEL KANT BY CHRISTOPHER INSOLE 24:52
RADICAL ORTHODOXY SIMON OLIVER 24:50
HISTORICAL JESUS QUEST 1778 1914 BY CLIVE MARSH 24:59
LIBERATION THEOLOGY & RADICAL CHRISTIANITY WITH CHRISTOPHER ROWLAND 25:00
JOHN COTTINGHAM ON DESCARTES 1 24:57
GEORGE PATTISON ON HEIDEGGER 21:13
DAVID HUME BY DAVID FURGUSSON.mpg 24:36
PETER HARRISON SCIENCE RELIGION AND THE ENLIGHTENMENT.mpg 21:08
PAUL NIMMO SCHLEIERMACHER 25:22
TOM GREGGS ON DIETRICH BONHOEFFER 25:53
ROWAN WILLIAMS BY MIKE HIGTON 14:08
DAVID CHEETHAM ON JOHN HICK 13:34
Andrew Shanks on Hegel's Faith and Thought .mpg 16:19
DERRIDA AND THEOLOGY BY STEVEN SHAKESPEARE 21:54
DARWIN AND GOD by NICK SPENCER 15:46
Kierkegaard by Steven Shakespeare .mpg 14:38
DAVID CLOUGH ON KARL BARTH 9:09
KARL BARTH PART2 DAVID CLOUGH 15:31
Key Figures From Early Feminist Theology by Rachel Muers.mpg 13:00
BULTMANN by David Fergusson.mpg 9:49
Karen Kilby on Hans Urs von Balthasar 8:28
Richard Bauckham Jurgen Moltmann 10:30
Anthony Thiselton on Paul Ricoeur 10:19
Hans Frei 7:50
THEOLOGY OF RELIGIONS GAVIN D' COSTA 9:57
Pannenberg 10:04
Pannenberg 2 of 2 Christology.mpg 6:43
Karen Kilby, Balthasar ,2 of 2, Central Themes 10:25
the kalam cosmologial argument william lane craig (part 1/2) 9:53
RICHARD DAWKINS THE GOD DELUSION RESPONSE BY WILLIAM LANE CRAIG 9:47
KEITH WARD RICHARD BAUCKHAM TOM WRIGHT EVIL AND SUFFERING SOME CONTRASTING PERSPECTIVES PART 1 OF 2 10:04
Karren Kilby on KARL RAHNER 9:58
WRIGHT, WARD, BAUCKHAM - EVIL AND SUFFERING & SOME CONTRASTING PERSPECTIVES PART 2 OF 2 9:40
SIMONE WEIL PART 2 STEPHEN PLANT 20:13
MODERN VIDEO TIMELINE 2012 ONLINE 1:19
ANTHONY THISELTON PART 2 24:55
WITTGENSTEIN PART 2 STEPHEN MULHALL 22:34
SCHLEIERMACHER PART 2 PAUL NIMMO 24:13
THEOLOGICAL AESTHETICS PART 2 FROM COLERIDGE TO BALTHASAR WITH BEN QUASH 21:22
Summer 2012 Promotional Video.m2v 1:01
EZEKIEL THOMAS RENZ 21:38
KANT PART TWO CHRISTOPHER INSOLE SAMPLE 21:26
WHY BELIEVE? By JOHN COTTINGHAM 23:11
NIETZSCHE BY STEPHEN WILLIAMS PART 2 SAMPLE.mpg 24:17
RICHARD BRIGGS HERMENEUTICS 10:17
SIMPLY SCRIPTURE Exploring popular metaphors and models 24:16
Presentation video.mp4 0:43
SIMONE WEIL STEPHEN PLANT 24:59
NIETZSCHE'S CRITIQUE OF CHRISTIANITY STEPHEN N WILLIAMS 24:07
IMMANUEL KANT BY CHRISTOPHER INSOLE 24:52
COLERIDGE & ROMANTICISM BY DOUGLAS HEDLEY 25:00
LACAN BY MARCUS POUND 22:39
JOHN LOCKE. THEOLOGY,ETHICS & POLITICS BY JOHN PERRY 25:00
KARL BARTH AND CONTEMPORARY THEOLOGY BY TOM GREGGS 25:00
MARX,MARXISM AND THEOLOGY BY CHRISTOPHER BRITTAIN 35:07
CARL SCHMITT AND POLITICAL THEOLOGY WITH RICHARD SUBWORTH 27:55
POSTMODERN PHILOSOPHY AND FAITH 31:22
JOHN CALVIN BY TONY LANE PART 2 38:25
GALILEO AND MEDIEVAL SCIENCE BY JAMES HANNAM 28:24
JOHN CALVIN BY TONY LANE 1 35:22
PLATO AND THEOLOGY BY ANDREW DAVISON 32:27
JOHN HENRY NEWMAN BY JOHN DAVIES 35:16
FAITH AND REASON YESTERDAY AND TODAY 23:54
SIGMUND FREUD BY MICHAEL LACEWING 39:13
HEIDEGGER PART 2 BY GEORGE PATTISON 28:41
PAUL TILLICH PART 2 WITH RUSSELL REMANNING 29:52
NATURAL THEOLOGY RUSSELL REMANNING 16:42
Slavoj Žižek by Marcus Pound 18:11
JOSEPH BUTLER BY CHRISTOPHER CUNLIFFE 25:00
# automatic playing for the 38 videos (click the up-left corner for the list)
source: Mark Thorsby 上次更新日期:2016年1月25日
This course introduces viewers to an introduction to formal symbolic logic. We cover the basics of argumentation, categorical logic, propositional logic, propositional proofs (natural deduction), and predicate logic.
Philosopher John Locke once wrote that "logic is the anatomy of thought." This course follows along that vein of thought in that this course will teach students to analyze and evaluate arguments using the formal techniques of modern symbolic logic.
In our everyday lives, we are confronted with an enormous amount of challenges that require an acute ability to quickly interpret, evaluate, and synthesize information and arguments.
Whether watching television, reading the political punditry of a local newspaper, listening to the well intentioned ideas of a family member, or by being presented with a series of radical ideas by a professor - people everywhere are vying for your opinion and consent and they do so through argumentation.
Some of the arguments we are presented with in life are strong, others are weak, and many are flatly false. The aim of this course is to give students the tool set necessary for diagnosing what is and is not trustworthy within the terrain of reasonable thought.
Like a physician trained in the art of human anatomy, the logician holds the confidence and ability to break apart arguments and peer beneath the ruse of rhetorical device in search of truth.
This course sets students upon a path of finely honed critical skills essential for life in the modern world.
1.1 Basic Concepts: Arguments, Premises, & Conclusions 35:33
1.2 Recognizing Arguments 26:03
1.3 Deduction & Induction 36:08
1.4 Validity, Truth, Soundness, Strength, Cogency 34:27
1.5 Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity 26:45
2.1 Varieties of Meaning 25:13
2.2 The Intension and Extension of Terms 31:36
3A Fallacies in General, Relevance, & Weak Induction 51:20
3B Fallacies of Presumption, Ambiguity, and Transference 46:45
4.1 The Components of Categorical Propositions 20:00
4.2 Quantity, Quality, & Distribution 20:11
4.3 Venn Diagrams & The Modern Square of Opposition 40:20
4.4 Conversion, Obversion, and Contraposition 29:57
4.5 The Traditional Square of Opposition 28:53
4.6 Venn Diagrams and the Traditional Standpoint 22:16
5.1 Standard Form, Mood, and Figure 29:45
5.2 Venn Diagrams 48:08
5.3 Rules and Fallacies 30:06
5.6 Enthymemes 17:57
5.7 Sorites 32:22
6.1 Symbols & Translation 49:04
6.2 Truth Functions 57:50
6.3 Truth Tables for Propositions 51:45
6.4 Truth Tables for Arguments 39:26
6.5 Indirect Truth Tables 34:10
7.1 Rules of Implication I 53:05
7.2 Rules of Implication II 43:07
7.3 Rules of Replacement I 52:50
7.4 Rules of Replacement II 32:06
7.5 Conditional Proof 25:00
7.6 Indirect Proof 24:05
8.1 Predicate Logic: Symbols & Translation 57:48
8.2 Predicate Logic: Using the Rules of Inference 50:51
8.3 Change of Quantifier Rule 33:01
8.4 Predicate Logic: Condition & Indirect Proof 42:33
8.5 Predicate Logic: Finite Universe Method 1:08:53
Appendix 1. Philosophical Logic 1:17:05
Appendix 2: Diagramming Arguments 20:54
The Banach–Tarski Paradox 24:14 [Vsauce]
1. Frege: "Thought, Sense, & Reference" 1:22:46
1. An Introduction to Social & Political Philosophy 54:37
2. Introduction to Plato's Republic 1:05:29
3. An Introduction to Aristotle's Politics 1:38:29
4. An Introduction to Machiavelli's Prince 1:04:59
6. Introduction to Hobbes' Leviathan 1:19:18
6. Introduction to John Locke's Political Philosophy 1:21:53
10. Introduction to Hegel's Social Philosophy 54:20
12. Introduction to Karl Marx 1:32:55
12. Introduction to Critical Theory 1:19:03
13. Introduction to Foucault 1:17:27
14. John Rawls & The Principles of Justice 51:22
15. Robert Nozick on Distributive Justice 1:00:25
# automatic playing for the 40 videos (click the up-left corner for the list)
source: nptelhrd 2015年4月29日 (list complied by akhil bharathan)
Aspects of Western Philosophy by Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, IIT Madras. For more details on NPTEL visit http://nptel.ac.in
This course provides an overview of major works of social thought from the beginning of the modern era through the 1920s. Attention is paid to social and intellectual contexts, conceptual frameworks and methods, and contributions to contemporary social analysis. Writers include Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Montesquieu, Adam Smith, Marx, Weber, and Durkheim. Complete course materials are available at the Open Yale Courses website: http://open.yale.edu/courses
This course explores main answers to the question "when do governments deserve our allegiance?" It starts with a survey of major political theories of the Enlightenment—Utilitarianism, Marxism, and the social contract tradition—through classical formulations, historical context, and contemporary debates relating to politics today. It then turns to the rejection of Enlightenment political thinking. Lastly, it deals with the nature of, and justifications for, democratic politics, and their relations to Enlightenment and Anti-Enlightenment political thinking. Practical implications of these arguments are covered through discussion of a variety of concrete problems.
A series of lectures delivered by Peter Millican to first-year philosophy students at the University of Oxford. The lectures comprise the 8-week General Philosophy course and were delivered in late 2009. Slides for all his lectures can be found here: http://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/people/peter...