2013-07-29
Tito Beveridge: Hitting It Against All Odds
source: Big Think
2013-07-26 At first glance, Tito Beveridge, the charismatic founder of Tito's Handmade Vodka, appears to be an unlikely success story, possibly even a complete fluke.
Beveridge tells Big Think he didn't set out to build a big nationwide vodka company. He just set out "to meet some girls, write off my bar tab, and maybe make $1,200 a month." So what's the moral of this story? Beveridge did what he loved, followed his dream, and ended up beating the odds. Maybe his success is not such a fluke after all.
SUBSCRIBE to Big Think: http://goo.gl/cZlhxI
Transcript -- As I've kind of gone along in my careers, I was a geophysicist first, I worked for oil and gas companies, subsurface mapping, I was a well site geologist, I did seismic data processing. And then I became a mortgage broker. Which it seemed like it's not a likely path for a vodka maker, but actually, in the end, it ended up being like the perfect recipe in my mind for a vodka maker.
The turning point for me was when I saw this guy on TV and he said, "If you're trying to figure out what to do with your life, take a sheet a paper and you draw a line down the middle and on one side you put what you love to do, on the other side you put what you're good at." And it's usually good to have like a few glasses of Tito's before you do this just to kind of loosen yourself up, a little truth serum. And then you sit there and you look at it and you try to incorporate everything you wrote down, as many things as possible into what you're dream job is.
And the theory behind it is that if you're doing something that you love to do, that you're good at, then you'll work harder at it. And you'll probably be better at it and you won't feel like you're busting your ass, you'll feel like you're going out, you're having fun, and stuff that you would normally would want to do anyway whether you got paid for it or not. For me going out to this little shack that I built out in the country and cooking booze and sitting there like tasting these little test tubes just as it's coming off the still, I mean, to me that did not seem like work to me. And it still doesn't. I just still enjoy going out there, have a few test tubes in my back pocket. And so, you know, would I spend a lot of time doing work? Yeah, I mean, I had a cot out there, I lived there out of, you know, I mean, I lived next to the still with my dog.
And so yeah, I spent a lot of time doing it, but I enjoyed it. I think that's just kind of all part of it. I mean, as far as like hard work, it's like, I don't know, you know, I guess there's people that are workers and people that aren't. But I've always just looked at it like I enjoy working. You know, when I'm not working I just tend to like sleep later and later and next thing you know I'm waking up and it's like 3:30 in the afternoon. I don't do well. I'm one of these people that's like, I'm like an old bird dog, you got to keep me working all the time or I'll be out chasing rabbits or something. So hard work and tenacity, you know, following your dreams, you know, hitting it against the odds, it's like, you know, I mean I didn't set out to build a big nationwide vodka company. I really just set out to meet some girls, write off my bar tab, you know, maybe make like $1,200 a month, you know. That would just be awesome. You know, and it just, it just kind of kept going and going and going and going and, yeah. And it worked out.
Directed / Produced by Jonathan Fowler and Elizabeth Rodd
2013-07-25
Would You Kill Baby Hitler? (And Other Psychopathic Musings, with Kevin ...
source: Big Think 2013-07-24
Psychologist and psychopath expert Kevin Dutton sets up thorny moral dilemmas and speculates on the psychopathic, utilitarian tendencies of politicians.
Original Trolley Problem video here: http://goo.gl/TXgn0C
Transcript-
When we talk about the trolley problem, actually research has been done on the kinds of people who are willing to shove the fat guy over the rails. And what that research has uncovered is that these people tend to be utilitarian's in our society, okay. They tend to be people who are able to get the job done, who are less morally squeamish.
Now I've actually presented a variation of this dilemma to various psychopaths. I'll give an example of what the variation of the dilemma is. Imagine that you are a transplant surgeon. And you have five patients all in need of a transplant, heart, lungs, whatever. Okay? And they're all gonna die if they don't get that transplant, but there are no matching donors available.
Just by chance, a young traveler happens to walk past your surgery one day for just a regular check-up. And it turns out, hypothetically, that he is a direct match for all five, okay.
Now imagine that you are the transplant surgeon. Imagine if there was no come back to you, if that traveler somehow disappeared, okay. Would it be right to kill that young traveler in order to take his five organs to transplant them into your five patients?
Now, most people -- again it's the five and one life score. It's exactly like the trolley problem. But most people would say absolutely not. No, that's just not right. It's ethically not right to kill that person. But I've given this to psychopathic killers and they've said, well actually, you know what? Imagine if you were the families of those five guys. One life lost, is it really that bad when you're saving five others? What if that guy was an evil terrorist? And the five guys who needed to transplants were peace workers or aid workers, for instance. Would that make it any different?
Now, these are kinds of -- not exactly that -- but these are kinds of scenarios, these are kinds of decisions that world leaders and politicians have to grapple with. Here's another little one to conjure with. Imagine that you were, hypothetically, left in a room with a newborn baby, okay.
And you were left in that room for ten minutes with that newborn baby. And I told you -- and you have to believe this is true -- that that newborn baby will grow one day into Adolph Hitler, okay. And I told you that there would be no moral comeback, no legal comebacks on you were you to kill that baby with a pillow and walk out of that room.
Now, what would you do? Would you kill that baby and save millions of lives further on down the line in history? Or would you not be able to do it? These are moral conundrums, which are kind of played out in everyday life. I'm obviously reducing these to absurdities. But these are the kinds of decisions on a lesser level that you have to make if you're a politician or if you're a world leader.
Sending anyone out in to battle knowing that there's a chance that they might not come back, committing thousands of troops to a war is something that not many people can carry lightly on their conscience.
And if you look at psychopathic traits, actually, you know, psychopathic traits are pretty well represented in politicians and world leaders. You think about it. You know, politicians and leaders have to deal with all sorts of nasty kinds of crisis during their administrations, anything from the threats from rouge states to natural disasters like hurricanes or floods.
Also, though, they have to be pretty confident to run for office at all. They have to be very good at presenting themselves in a certain light. And they have to be very persuasive and manipulative. I mean, one senior UK politician, who should for obvious reasons remain nameless, had a great quote. And he said to me, "You know, in politics the only way to know who's stabbing you in the back is to see their reflection in the eyes of the person stabbing you from the front."
That's a great kind of quote, which, for me, sums up that kind of snakes and ladders game. Every man for himself, cut throat, kind of existence that characterizes politics I would say probably across the board in most nations of the world.
Directed and Produced by Jonathan Fowler and Elizabeth Rodd
2013-07-24
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)